Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as a cause of acute leucocytoclastic vasculitis with anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies

  1. Antonio Ji-Xu 1 , 2,
  2. Liam Carroll 1,
  3. Thomas Bentley 3 and
  4. Rachael Jarrett 1
  1. 1 Department of Dermatology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
  2. 2 Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
  3. 3 Medical Sciences Division, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Antonio Ji-Xu; ajixu@ucdavis.edu

Publication history

Accepted:07 Apr 2022
First published:22 Apr 2022
Online issue publication:22 Apr 2022

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration is associated with a diverse range of cutaneous sequelae. Serious dermatological side effects of G-CSF include the development of Sweet’s syndrome and exacerbations of pre-existing inflammatory disorders such as psoriasis. Here, we describe a report of acute leucocytoclastic vasculitis caused by G-CSF therapy associated with anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies in a patient with multiple myeloma. This case highlights the importance of having a high index of suspicion for acute leucocytoclastic vasculitis in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing G-CSF therapy.

Background

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a myeloid growth factor that stimulates neutrophil proliferation and is commonly used in patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid and haematological malignancies.1 Serious dermatological side effects of G-CSF include Sweet’s syndrome and exacerbations of pre-existing inflammatory disorders such as psoriasis.2 Acute leucocytoclastic vasculitis (ALV) is an extremely rare complication of G-CSF therapy, having been reported in less than 10 patients receiving G-CSF treatment.3 No previous reports have described an association between ALV and anti-Ro or anti-La antibodies. Here, we describe the first case, to our knowledge, of G-CSF induced ALV associated with anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies. Our case illustrates how patients with skin of colour may have atypical presentations of G-CSF-induced ALV, and therefore, clinicians should have a high index of clinical suspicion in this patient population.

Case presentation

A man in his 50s presented with a 1-day history of rapidly progressive painful ankle swelling and darkening of his ankles and soles. This started 3 days after daily G-CSF injections for management of leucopenia. His leucopenia was secondary to melphalan and bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone chemotherapy with an autograft for IgG kappa multiple myeloma. He denied any other rashes, photosensitivity, oral ulcers, arthralgias, chest pain, shortness of breath, haematuria, dry eyes or dry mouth. A medical history was notable for treated pulmonary sarcoidosis, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and resolved hepatitis B. Medications included acyclovir as prophylaxis for varicella zoster virus infection and omeprazole.

Examination revealed bilateral ankle oedema which was exquisitely tender to palpation. There were hyperpigmented macules and patches on both palms, lateral malleoli, and plantar surfaces of the feet (figure 1). Systemic examination was unremarkable.

Figure 1

(A) Hyperpigmentation of ankles with ankle oedema. (B) Clear fluid filled blister over the lateral malleolus. (C) Hyperpigmented macules on the plantar surfaces of the feet.

Investigations

Laboratory investigations showed a haemoglobin of 9.6 g/L (normal range 13.5–17.5 g/L), white cell count of 26×109 /L (normal range 4–11 × 109 /L), neutrophils of 15.5×109 /L (normal range 2.0–7.5 × 109 /L), C reactive protein of 27.6 mg/L (normal range <3.0 mg/L) and serum ACE of 70 U/L (normal range <40 U/L). Renal function was within normal limits. An autoimmune screen showed a raised speckled antinuclear antibody titre (1:640, normal range <1:40) and raised anti-Ro and anti-La antibody levels (>100 U/mL, normal range <20 U/mL), which were negative on previous testing prior to the development of ALV. Rheumatoid factor, antibodies to double-stranded DNA, other extractable nuclear antibodies (Sm, RNP, Scl-70, Jo1), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) and cryoglobulins were all negative. Viral serology was negative for hepatitis B surface antigen and positive for antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen and against hepatitis B surface antigen, indicating a resolved infection. Complement levels were normal. X-rays and ultrasound of the ankles were unremarkable. Serum and urine electrophoresis and bone marrow trephine showed no evidence of residual monoclonal gammopathy or myeloma.

Incisional biopsy from the ankle revealed full-thickness epidermal necrosis with vascular thrombosis affecting the capillaries, mural fibrinoid change and neutrophils with leucocytoclasia (figure 2). This was consistent with a diagnosis of ALV with secondary epidermal infarction.

Figure 2

(A) Largely intact epidermis on the right side with infarcted epidermis on the left side resulting in pale staining and loss of cell definition. The underlying dermal vessels are mostly packed with thrombus (H&E×10). (B) Typical focus of acute leucocytoclastic vasculitis (H&Ex20).

Differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis included other causes of vasculitis including cutaneous sarcoidosis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren syndrome and mixed cryoglobulinaemia. However, the temporal association between G-CSF and the onset of symptoms, which was consistent with previous reports,3 and the rapid improvement after G-CSF discontinuation, pointed to G-CSF as the most likely culprit of the vasculitis. Furthermore, the patient’s sarcoidosis was well controlled, and he denied any classical symptoms of connective tissue disorders. Negative laboratory evaluation also helped exclude ANCA-associated vasculitis and mixed cryoglobulinaemia.

Treatment

G-CSF was discontinued. He was started on a 2-week course of oral prednisolone, and morphine and paracetamol for analgesia.

Outcome and follow-up

He made a rapid clinical improvement and was discharged on a tapering course of prednisolone 2 days after starting treatment. Full resolution of the rash was achieved after 2 weeks.

Discussion

ALV is an extremely rare complication of G-CSF treatment in neutropenic patients. Previous reports have shown a likely correlation between the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and the incidence of vasculitis.3 4 Compared with previous reports, our patient displayed anti-Ro/La autoantibody positivity. This might suggest that coexistence of underlying inflammatory conditions, which are known to predispose to immune complex formation3 4 and activate FCγ receptors on neutrophils,5–8 could have played a factor in the development of vasculitis (figure 3). Interestingly, G-CSF administration has also been shown to trigger vasculitis in neutropenic patients with SLE.9 Therefore, caution should be exercised when considering G-CSF in this patient population.

Figure 3

Proposed mechanism for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-induced cutaneous vasculitis. (A) G-CSF acts to stimulate the proliferation, survival and differentiation of neutrophils via Janus kinases, signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins (JAK-STAT) intracellular pathways in myeloid progenitor cells. (B) Immune complex formation and neutrophil activation drive vessel damage in response to G-CSF therapy in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions. HBV, hepatitis B virus; PMN, polymorphonuclear leucocytes; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

ALV should be suspected in patients receiving G-CSF treatment who develop vasculitic skin lesions with an ANC above 8×109/L. Notably, lesions may present as subtle non-blanching hyperpigmented macules and patches in darker Fitzpatrick skin types, compared with the ‘classical’ purpuric appearance seen in fairer skin.10 Although there are no specific clinical guidelines for the management of G-CSF-induced ALV, this condition can be managed following general treatment principles for ALV. Diagnosis should be confirmed by full thickness punch or excisional skin biopsy, and treatment with oral corticosteroids may be indicated to hasten resolution.3

This case illustrates the importance of having a high index of suspicion for ALV in patients receiving G-CSF therapy, especially those with inflammatory risk factors that may predispose to immune complex formation.

Learning points

  • Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-induced acute leucocytoclastic vasculitis can be associated with anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies.

  • Patients with skin of colour may have atypical presentations of G-CSF-induced acute leucocytoclastic vasculitis.

  • The management of G-CSF-induced acute leucocytoclastic vasculitis includes topical steroids, analgesia and discontinuation of G-CSF. Systemic steroids can be considered in severe cases.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Footnotes

  • Contributors AJ-X and LC drafted the manuscript. LC created and formatted the figures. TB and RJ reviewed the manuscript. AJ-X and RJ were the physicians who contributed to the care of the patient.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer